Continuing from yesterday.
Tried changing index_delta from 0.5 to 0.25. ML suddenly dropped a lot. Realized that oversampling the smoothed curves causes significant degree of many-to-one, and our code prevents skipping more than one or two points during correspondences.
Main Idea: Sampling period should be equal to (or close to) the data point-spacing.
Allow indices to correspond to continuous values between the samples.
Modified correspondence/corr_to_likelihood.m
to post-process indices to search the neighboring line segments for a better value. Re-ran tr_prep_likelihood
to reconstruct Corrs collection. ML improves after fix.
Need to confirm improved indexing by visualizing results. See experiments/exp_2013_08_15_visualize_indices.m
, still in progress. Some apparent bugs in aforementioned changes, causing bad results. Still investigating...
Last week, I derived the equation for finding the maximum posterior per-view reconstruction. Now we have a formula for the unobserved mean curve, i.e. the curve that each view is perturbed from. Iterestingly, they both have the same form:
Note that this is slightly different from the form used in a previous post. This form is equivalent, and better reflects the form used by Williams and Rasmussen.
Modified curve_max_posterior_2.m
by adding an extra optional parameter, kernel_2
. If set, it assumes you want a mean reconstruction instead of a per-view reconstruction, and uses kernel_2
to build \(K*\).
Added an extra flag to experiments/exp_2013_08_11_reconstruct_for_web.m
, which if set to true, will also plot the mean curve.